NATION | U.S. HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
Holocaust archive coming to D.C.
EDWIN BLACK
WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The International Tracing Service's secret
Holocaust archive at Bad Arolsen, Germany, is preparing to transfer
millions of images of concentration-camp prisoner documents to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum under embargo, according to sources in Germany and the United States familiar with the transfer.
A May 14 meeting of the 11-nation committee that oversees the archive
is expected to authorize the partial transfer, but only on condition
that an embargo be imposed on accessing the materials.
The embargo is needed because three of the 11 nations
that must ratify the release of the documents -- Greece, Belgium and
France -- have yet to sign the authorization agreement.
European sources familiar with the process suggested
that Belgium and France would not sign the agreement until after this
summer or even early next year because of domestic electoral
considerations. Still, the process of data transfer is being
accelerated to prepare for the eventual release.
The Holocaust museum has agreed to keep the documents
secret until authorized by the 11-government committee -- meaning that
for now, at least, the archive's legacy of secrecy will transfer as
well.
Museum officials declined to confirm the information or provide details on the pending transfer.
JTA has learned, however, that the transfer will include 10 million
digitized images of documents to be transported in several 500-gigabyte
hard drives that plug into any computer via a simple USB connection.
Small, lightweight, portable drives obviate the prospect of managing
linear miles of archival documents.
The museum plans to assemble the raw images into a
database with a search engine that can be accessed from one or more
terminals in the museum's archive. The gargantuan collection will
instantly double the size of the museum's holdings.
While the museum archive is among the most helpful in
the Holocaust community, its small staff, handful of microfilm-reader
machines and several computer terminals often cannot keep up with user
requests, especially in the summer.
In addition to on-site usage of the archive, some 8,000
requests come to the museum each year via mail, phone and e-mail, and
the archive staff tries to fulfill those as soon as possible. The
backlog for inquiries at Bad Arolsen in 2006 exceeded 425,000,
according to a recent congressional report prepared by the State
Department.
The Bad Arolsen collection includes records of more than
19 million individuals. Holocaust museum sources admit that massive
linguistic training would be needed before the staff could even begin
to provide information.
Sources suggest that the information would be accessed
mainly via a few on-site computer terminals at the museum. Terminal
access would be strictly prohibited from outside the building, even
though remote access is routinely available for government and
historical databases.
As the museum gears up to receive the trove, several
members of the U.S. Congress, the archival community and members of
grassroots Holocaust groups are questioning why the museum should be
given the documents.
Some 75 percent of Bad Arolsen's holdings provide
information on non-Jewish Holocaust victims, which has led several
experts on Nazi documentation to say that the collection would be more
suited to the National Archives and its regional network.
Critics also are concerned that the museum's unwritten
taboo on issues relating to corporate involvement in the Holocaust is
inconsistent with a collection that largely involves slave labor. The
museum repeatedly has refused to discuss questions involving IBM,
General Motors, Ford, Standard Oil, the Carnegie Institution, the
Rockefeller Foundation and other leading American corporate icons that
funded, supported, participated or profited from the Holocaust.
Paul Shapiro, the museum's point man for Bad Arolsen,
told JTA that he has quietly assembled a list of companies he has seen
in Bad Arolsen archives, but it remains secret. Museum officials
refused to discuss "Shapiro's list."
Most of all, some survivor groups are asking why the
records would be housed in Washington, where many elderly survivors
cannot access them because of the cost, the logistics and their frail
health.
"I don't think Washington would be an appropriate place
for the documents because the majority of survivors live in New York or
Miami," said Leo Rechter, president of the National Association of
Holocaust Survivors. "We know that 50,000 survivors live in New York
City. Relatively few live in Washington, D.C. The majority of survivors
are not computer savvy.
"From a practical point of view, a copy should be here
in New York where anyone can easily get to it," he said. "We can
arrange rides downtown if need be to ask a clerk to help. But in
Washington, these files would be just another museum attraction."
David Mermelstein, co-chairman of Miami Holocaust Survivors of Dade County, agreed.
"If the files are in Washington, it would be a problem. It should be in
Florida, Brooklyn, Chicago and Los Angeles, he said. "We have 10,000
survivors here. Most of them of them do not use computers or they have
bad eyesight."
Nonetheless, museum officials said they will not permit
archival access via the open Internet or via terminals at libraries and
universities around the country, the way other databases of documents
are commonly accessed. Museum officials declined to explain their
motives for restricting access.
However, Mermelstein passionately argued for unrestricted access.
"Every day," he said, "there are people dying not knowing what happened
to their loved ones. With the documents here in Florida, we can ensure
that anyone could get a ride to the library so they could ask someone
to check their name."
One congressional source close to the Bad Arolsen
transfer asked, "What am I missing? Why can't these documents be
located near the survivors themselves?"
Edwin Black is The New York Times' best-selling
author of the award-winning "IBM and the Holocaust" and is responsible
for a series of investigations revealing the contents of the ITS
archives at Bad Arolsen. His stories on the subject can be viewed at http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/BadArolsenArticles.php.
|